Originally posted November 19, 2005 @ 18:36
The Global Language Monitor has released a list of 2005’s top Politically (in)Correct phrases. It includes examplary samples of bovine excreta such as
Thought Shower or Word Shower substituting for brainstorm so as not to offend those with brain disorders such as epilepsy.
and
Womyn for Women to distance the word from man. This in spite of the fact that the term man in the original Indo-European is gender neutral (as have been its successors for some 5,000 years).
As intellectually challenged as an imperative signal of angry dismissal, oftentimes a synonym for coital interaction.
Personally, I don’t call a spade an entrenchment tool. If you’re missing a leg, you’re crippled. You’re a cripple. It means exactly that - Someone who is impeded (maybe not mentally) but physically nonetheless by the lack of a limb. I would think twice about using “disabled” or, heaven forbid, these abled.
My stuff is old, not pre-owned. You’re a juvenile delinquent, not a troubled youth. Civillian deaths are not collateral damage. I do not expect to be served by a waitron. A stewardess is a stewardess. He’s got a penis, he’s a steward. You’re not flight attendants nor cabin staff. I brainstorm, whether you have one or not. I’m a Chink, you’re a Flip, he’s a Negro.
I am homo sapiens, Man! Not a generic humanoid carbon unit, you anus. May all you politically-correct people be taken by an unforeseen cardiovascular event.
UPDATE: Bumped this to the top again cos, well, I felt like it. And I think it could use some discussion…
Fuzzy said in his comment:
Actually, some cripples object to the use of the word cripple being used on people who are simply motion-impaired, because it trivializes their own plight. I guess on some level it sucks to be put in the same category as someone missing a toe when you\’re paralyzed from neck down.
Isn’t that why all this PC crap is everywhere…? Language (at least your everyday variety, not your average lawyer’s writ) isn’t exact. It can’t be… if it were, we’d have no metaphors or similies. Poetry would just be unintelligible gibberish. Just because someone marginally falls under some category they find offensive doesn’t make that category inaccurate. Perhaps some people are just more crippled than others, but they’re all cripples alike.
I realize this is kinda ironic, because I seem to be implying that semantics has everything to do with syntax, which itself is exact and technically-binding (while earlier asserting that language isn’t exact), but hey, this ain’t no lawyer’s writ, and you know what I’m getting at.
/confusing myself.
//semantics failure.
UPDATE: I shall try again. Language doesn’t have to be totally inexact, and it isn’t. It’s exact enough to tell us, for example, what a cripple is. but it isn’t always exact enough (and shouldn’t be) to differentiate between levels of cripple- um.. ness. Yeah. That’s it. If the guy twictching in the wheelchair, on a respirator and clutching his colostomy bag wants to tag himself with a polysyllabic medical term to differentiate himself from the guy missing a toe, that’s all well and good, but that doesn’t make my umbrella term any less concise than it already is, and people should just live with that.
/deep breath.
Gary :: Nov.23.2005 ::
Bitchin' ::
2 Comments »